Obi-wan; In Wexler The Answer You Shall Find

Now you know who is the more foolish...the fool who follows the fool. Case in point? Consumate idiot and Marack toady Robert Wexler. The craven idiot, on a recent visit to Israel where he met Binyamin Netanyahu, went on record saying:

"A request for a moratorium or freeze in settlement activity that can be mutually agreed upon by the US and Israel in the next several weeks is a tiny, tiny gesture and down payment to make when you look at potentially what is on the other side of the equation."

The supposed payoff of that equation would be the Arab states normalizing relations with Israel. Then Wexler laid on this steaming pile of crap:

"I want to call their bluff. I want to see, if Israel makes substantial movement toward a credible peace process, whether they are willing to do it. And if they are not, better that we should find out five or six months into the process, before Israel is actually asked to compromise any significant position."

Bob...what were you doing the day after Netanyahu's speech at Bar Ilan? You obviously weren't paying any attention to the reaction from the Arab world. The Arab nations (including Egypt) you stupidly think would potentially move to normalization over something as ludicrous as a settlement freeze, in areas that would end up in Israel anyway, all rejected the most basic notion of recognizing Israel as a Jewish state.

But just when you think Wexler has reached the acme of stupid he decides to kick it up a notch. When asked if Israel would accept a settlement freeze he said:

"I don't think Israel will say no. I don't see an equation where it is in Israel's interest to say no, so I believe Israel will say yes, under a certain set of qualifications that Israel will agree to. This is one hundred percent in Israel's national security interest."

So making concessions to a hostile entity bent on genocide, an entity that has time and again rejected Israel's right to exist, and did so less than a month ago for the 10,000th time, is in Israel's national security interest? Really? How so, Bob? Maybe you should ask the genius who sold you on this insipid plan; your lord and savior Marack Pajama.

You don't think Israel will say no? So certain are you? Well, chew on this buttface. The JPost reports that the latest assessments are indicating that the Arabs will not move toward normalization over a settlement freeze. Uh...duh! The Post reports:

"...the Persian Gulf and North African states are unlikely to make significant moves unless Saudi Arabia does, and the Saudis believe they made their gesture toward Israel in the form of the 2002 Arab peace initiative.

Obama, according to these reports, still believes the Saudis can be persuaded to moved on the issue.

And just what exactly does Marack have to offer the Saudis? Well, apart from destroying Israel...nothing. So, tell me again how this is in Israel's best interests, Bob. Tell us how making concessions like this for nothing in return is in Israel's national security interests. But wait 'til I stop laughing because I can't breathe. Oh wait...that's me choking on the farts coming out of your mouth.

But don't worry folks, Bobby Wexler's lips are so far up Marack's rear that he has gleaned this from his savior's small intestine:

[Obama is making] "equal, if not greater, demands on the Arab world in the context of starting the process and negotiations."

Buwhahaha! Seriously?!? And what would those demands be, that he doesn't have to bow as much? He also said that the idea that the Arabs should make concessions first was, "Childish." Really...that's what he said. Childish.

But don't worry, Bob says that if the Arabs don't deliver, "All bets are off."

I'm sure the Israelis feel much better now.

So there you have it Obi-wan. The fool who follows is the more foolish.

Now, if we could just figure out if a dumbass Congressman from Florida falls down in a forest does he become even more stupid, then we'd really be onto something.