It's the same in any lingo

בַּת-בָּבֶל, הַשְּׁדוּדָה: אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיְשַׁלֶּם-לָךְ-- אֶת-גְּמוּלֵךְ, שֶׁגָּמַלְתּ לָנוּ
אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיֹּאחֵז וְנִפֵּץ אֶת-עֹלָלַיִךְ-- אֶל-הַסָּלַע

How can one be compelled to accept slavery? I simply refuse to do the master's bidding. He may torture me, break my bones to atoms and even kill me. He will then have my dead body, not my obedience. Ultimately, therefore, it is I who am the victor and not he, for he has failed in getting me to do what he wanted done. ~ Mahatma Gandhi
If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am not for others, what am I? If not now, when? ~ Rav Hillel, Pirke Avot

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes
Wear It With Pride

14 July 2009

The Gang of Stupid Is In...Clinton Never Was

H/T to lililam, and the gang at Bitterpoliticz for this article from World Net Daily.

Aaron Klein's diplomatic sources say that Marack's foreign policy is being dreamed up and executed by a small clique of leftist idiots who are bypassing other government agencies, and in some cases, possibly jeopardizing national security interests. Uh...duh! What have I been saying people? Let's go to the videotape.

A senior Middle East diplomatic source said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently apologized to a Mideast leader, explaining to him U.S. policy regarding his country is being dictated by the White House and not her agency.
The diplomatic sources all confirmed Clinton has been largely cut out from the decision-making process, as have U.S. National Security Adviser James Jones and other top figures.

Some of the other players in Marack's foreign policy cast of idiots are (be prepared for shock and awe): Rahmbo, David Axeldouche, NSC Director Denis McDonough (McDunno), NSC Chief of Staff Mark Lippert (Liposuction), Susan Lice, and Jim (Loggins &) Messina.

She did not get to appoint her deputies. They were put in place to pay back favors. Can you count the number of times his cabinet has met besides the marking of his first 100 days of blunder? No, because there hasn't been one.

The executive branch is being run by a bunch of idiots whose only accomplishment is that they successfully sold the most ignorant electorate on earth the Hope and Change Show brought to you by Exelon. If it's radioactive, it must be Excelon.

Are you getting the picture yet?

Look at the reaction to Iran. Look at our mishandling of Israel. Look at the fact that we are stupidly reinstating an ambassador in Syria when they are tied to Iran and North Korea. And speaking of North Korea, is there a more impotent response possible than essentially saying, "That wasn't very nice?"

Does the wholly and totally indecisive and rudderless ship of the administration's foreign policy seem like it is being led even remotely by Clinton? Are you getting the message? Everything you fought for is being shit on by that clown in the White House, but so many of you are still praising and worshipping her that you don't even see that she is being made into a joke by a douche who wouldn't be elected president of his local Optimist Club without bribing the members.

So PUMAs will you finally accept the truth? Hillary is not influencing the Little Lord Fraudleroy. She is going back and forth between being out of the loop or carrying his water. The way I see it this is a step backwards not only for Clinton, but for women in politics. Hillary is the foreign policy charwoman, the scullery maid. She's scrubbing the floor with a toothbrush while the "politburo" as one U.S. official is calling the above circle of stupid, runs our foreign policy into the same iceberg our economy is fixing to strike. In the meantime she is an accomplice to the current US run Israeli snuff film, and an enabler of the little dictator.

Drop the foolish notion that she is going to be able to steer the ship clear. It ain't gonna happen Cap'n. She was put in this position to be isolated, and make you happy. You have no reason to be happy when Hillary Clinton is made to go to China and shit on everything she stands for at the pleasure of the Resident. And in the meantime, Israel is being made to pay while she parrots his policies.

The time for her to get out and denounce him is now; not after more damage is done, and the only suitable adjective there will be to describe her is "complicit."

Hope you had a happy Bastille Day!


Mary Ellen/Nunly said...

Hi Shtuey, Sorry for the absence the last couple of days...just crazy at home.

Regarding Hillary, this is EXACTLY why I didn't want her to take any position within Obama's Administration. It was clear from the start, he was going to do all he could do to stifle her and the only time she will be mentioned will be when he blames her when things go awry.

The trouble is, she's stuck in this muck and how does she get out? If she resigns, she'll be pegged a "Sarah Palin" who can't take the heat and therefore the Obots and the OBot media will be talking 24/7 about how Hillary would never have been able to handle the job as Prez and therefore that vindicates their decision to put Obama in the Oval Office.

If Hillary complains, she will be pegged as a "whiner" who can't handle the stress of the job.

She's stuck between a rock and a hard place. Like I said...she should have told Obama to shove off, stayed in the Senate, and bide her time until the next election where she could wipe the floor with Obama after he f**ks up the country more than he already has. At this point, I think her chances of running for Prez are nill because Obama is destroying her.

Sorry for the long rant....I really can.not.stand.Obama!

jillforhill said...

WND,really just qoute dick morris who hates hillary more than anyone. WND who was founded by the guy who hates the clintons ans tried to put them in jail. You can do better.

Envoys her idea,not being on tv her idea and not being a mediawhore her idea. She works and does not need an applause track. She said she meets with obama a couple days a week,has breakfast with biden even more often. She told him more troops are needed and to get tougher on iran. 1 day after surgery she was on the phone dicussing iran. 2 days after surgery meeting at the WH there are pictures.

This got started by morris and carried by repubs on the net. Give me other sources than people who want to see hillary pushed aside and I will consider it until then I believe hillary.

lililam said...

I just wrote a long comment, but it disappeared. Anyway, I was saying that I am still torn by all of this- after i cited that article to you I also recalled that they (WND)were the ones who wrote that piece early in her tenure about her appointees being not her own, and much of that was disputed as untrue later. It is horrible and frightening to have the politburo image portrayed here, although it would be explanatory. I do not like the picture of Hillary as impotent or wrong, though, so i would, again, rather hear it straight. I have not heard her speech yet today nor have I heard anything else originating from her recently. I hope i was not in error offering you that article, Shtuey, I am at a loss to verify it, obviously. Your early quote is particularly damning, if true.

Shtuey said...

Aaron Klein operates out of Israel and, unlike the so-called journalists in the Marack Media, actually still does research and seeks sources. I don't discount information simply because of who's behind the source. The information is there and, in many respects, backs up my gut reaction to a lot of what we've been seeing on the foreign policy front. And what we've been seeing are situations handled so poorly, with such a lack of decisiveness, that I have a hard time believing Hillary is behind it.

I don't dispute that Hillary is a working Secretary of State. She has been attempting to change the culture at Foggy Bottom and I give her high marks for that. Regardless of the source of the story however, we have to look at what is playing out on the world stage.

I had the pleasure of meeting her and seeing her speak on a couple occasions during the campaign. We saw her debate. We heard her speak of her foreign policy priorities. One need only look at the namby pamby, willy nilly way the grand issues are being handled to see that Hillary is not taking the lead.

Our non-response to North Korea, the administration's virtual silence on the arrest and recent trial of Aung San Suu Kyui, the battering of Israel, the deprioritizing of engaging China on the human rights front. Based on Clinton's stances in the campaign, the Senate, as First Lady, and prior, who can honestly say that these matters are being handled in any that appears to have her stamp?

Our foreign policy is a rudderless ship. I don't need Aaron Klein to point this out to tell me the realities.

I don't dispute her claims that she meets with Obama and Biden regularly. But meetings don't necessarily mean that this is translating into them taking her council.

Let's not forget how Obama has always operated. He has his cronies, and everyone else is window dressing. And when he finds them no longer useful they get tossed under the bus.

Let's look at Iran as an example. If Hillary were truly an influence would there have been such hesitation on the part of the administration to act in the face of the protests? Would the Resident be walking away from the G8 feeling like he accomplished something by getting a "strong statement" condemning the mullahs' actions in the wake of the elections? Would we be sitting back and waiting until September to even begin discussing sanctions? Anonymous bodies are piling up in Iranian morgues. People are being yanked off the streets, and Obama wants to wait until September to deal with sanctions? This stance does not have Hillary's mark to it at all.

Colin Powell had regular meetings with the President, knew invading Iraq was a mistake...

It is encouraging that she has taken the White House to task on appointing a USAID director. USAID was something she considered a priority when she first addressed her staff when taking the helm at Foggy Bottom. It is foundational to her "smart power" agenda. Development in at risk countries is a priority for her as it can help diffuse situations where American security risks could metastasize. The fact that the White House has been dragging its feet tells me that either there is no agreement there, or she is being actively subverted, both of which are likely scenarios considering the ringleader's history.

Look at the handling of sending an ambassador back to Syria. Clinton wanted to press them, the White House fumbled. We're sending an ambassador back to Damascus and getting nothing in return. Does that sound like it has Hillary's mark?

I don't see how she is an influence considering the bullshit we are seeing.

Here's Tina Brown's take

lililam said...

Thank you for that explanation, shtuey.

workingclass artist said...

Always thought it was a big mistake for HRC to be Sec. of State because the Messiah & co.would never give her the authority to be effective. She decided she needed the foreign policy cred but I mean The messiah is such a disaster that GOP will overtake once again....This is why I'm no longer a democrat...