It's the same in any lingo

בַּת-בָּבֶל, הַשְּׁדוּדָה: אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיְשַׁלֶּם-לָךְ-- אֶת-גְּמוּלֵךְ, שֶׁגָּמַלְתּ לָנוּ
אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיֹּאחֵז וְנִפֵּץ אֶת-עֹלָלַיִךְ-- אֶל-הַסָּלַע

How can one be compelled to accept slavery? I simply refuse to do the master's bidding. He may torture me, break my bones to atoms and even kill me. He will then have my dead body, not my obedience. Ultimately, therefore, it is I who am the victor and not he, for he has failed in getting me to do what he wanted done. ~ Mahatma Gandhi
If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am not for others, what am I? If not now, when? ~ Rav Hillel, Pirke Avot

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes
Wear It With Pride

11 September 2008

National Pampers Radio Breaks the Hypocrisy Meter

Anyone not high from huffing the Poopy Pampers knows that NPR (National Pampers Radio) is so in the tank for him that the phrase journalistic integrity  is only used to get laughs around the water cooler.  Today was a glaring example brought to us by David Folkenflik.  Geraldo Rivera described Folkenfuck as, "a really weak-kneed, backstabbing, sweaty-palmed reporter,"(you know you're treading water in the journalistic cesspool when the guy who led us on the expedition to open Al Capone's vault is saying that).  From the bullshit story he ran on NPR's Boring Edition this morning I have to agree.  

Apparently Folkenloser takes umbrage with Governor Palin chronically talking about rejecting the bridge to nowhere.  He says it's a lie she repeats over and over despite the fact that the media has decided that her story is patently false.  He goes on to say, "She has repeated it at campaign stops since, as recently as Wednesday, and the anecdote has become a key element of her political biography..."

Mr. Folkendouche, since you were obviously asleep when your journalism professor discussed the subject of objective reporting I will give you the lesson you obviously missed.  When reporting on the failings or short comings of one candidate, it is considered ethical to make sure that the other side's similar faux pas are presented.  Since your lips are firmly clamped to Pampers' rectum I'll do that for you.

Senator Barry Pampers Obama ran his campaign on the theme of "change" sighting his rejection of campaign contributions from "federal registered lobbyists and PACs."  But Dan Morain of the LA Times reported in April 2007 that this stance was in reality patently false, going so far as to quote an independent analyst from a campaign finance think tank who flatly stated that Obama is in fact taking money, and thus beholden to, the same financial and corporate interests as every other candidate in the race.  

The central premise of Obama's campaign of change is in fact a grandiose obfuscation of facts, like all things Pampers.  But unlike the Palin situation, where the media is in a race to vet and destroy her, the MSM has largely turned a blind eye to this falsehood.  In fact National Pampers Radio has run a number of soundbites of Obama telling the lie, not even qualifying it with the "federal registered lobbyist" caveat.

So if you're going to call Palin a liar please do us the courtesy of saying the same about Obama. You might resemble a real journalist David.  I know your David Axelgoebels slave masters disagree, but really it wouldn't be so bad.  You could put it on your resume.  I'd even let you use me as a reference.

No comments: