It's the same in any lingo

בַּת-בָּבֶל, הַשְּׁדוּדָה: אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיְשַׁלֶּם-לָךְ-- אֶת-גְּמוּלֵךְ, שֶׁגָּמַלְתּ לָנוּ
אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיֹּאחֵז וְנִפֵּץ אֶת-עֹלָלַיִךְ-- אֶל-הַסָּלַע


How can one be compelled to accept slavery? I simply refuse to do the master's bidding. He may torture me, break my bones to atoms and even kill me. He will then have my dead body, not my obedience. Ultimately, therefore, it is I who am the victor and not he, for he has failed in getting me to do what he wanted done. ~ Mahatma Gandhi
If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am not for others, what am I? If not now, when? ~ Rav Hillel, Pirke Avot

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes
Wear It With Pride

07 March 2009

The Sound of Shit Hitting the Fan...Globally (UPDATE)

We now know why Resident Assface was so rude to Gordon Brown. Apparently little Lord Fauntlerdouche was tired from having to deal with the economic crisis that he helped create with his gross incompetence and desire to turn America into a festering useless Socialoid shit hole. H/T to Maryykate at bitterpoliticz for the scoop.

I know, I know. You voted for the Bus for the Intrepid Traveler. That was before the shit started hitting the fan...globally. You should have picked this slogan, and you should have known full well I was eventually going to change it. What else am I supposed to do?

Everything we predicted about a Pampers regime is coming to pass, only worse.


The Dow closed at 6626.94 on Friday. Anyone care to predict when it will hit 5000? What astounds me is how so many people are still believing this douchebag and his toadies. Truly, it is amazing. No earmarks, and all accountability all the time. And such transparency. I can see right through him.

There seems to be an uptick in the mocking of TelePrompter Jesus' Linus Van Peltian need to have...his teleprompter...everywhere he goes.



The press clearly has one agenda with this strategy. Get Pampers to stop using the teleprompter in the hopes he will generate more gaffes. Sorry guys, there are only so many times you can listen to the Uh...um...montage and still have it be funny.


Since we're on the subject, let's see how many hits we get for "Obama is an idiot" on Google....BRB...wow...11,800,00. There were only 2,540,000 hits for "Obama is a moron," and 1,140,000 hits for "Obama is a dumb ass."

The internet has spoken. Clearly the overwhelming majority feels that Obama is an idiot. I seem to be in the small minority that thinks he is a dumb ass idiot moron (only 432,000).

And while Obama's journey of self-discovery runs us over at home, let's see how he's working to protect our security abroad...

He's not.

It looks like Sultan Shirley Pampers Peron's plan of trying to fuck Israel in the ass is well under way, and Secretary Hillary "We'll nuke the shit out of Iran if they attack Israel" Clinton is right on board with the appeasers and Israel haters. Way to go Hillary. Looks like you really are just another full of crap politician who kissed American Jewry's collective ass as New York's junior Senator. I think as President the ass kissing would have continued, which would have been nominally better for Israel. But since she has about as much chance of becoming President as my spayed dog has of delivering a litter of kittens, there's really no point in doing anything else than kissing Pampers' ass and towing the line. Israel can eat cake. Barry and Hillary want to feel good about creating a Palestinian state.

Yes yes we know that it's your overriding priority to create a state for a government that so far hasn't shown the competence to properly run a post office, and is dedicated to destroying Israel. So much for the Palestinians living side by side with a secure Israel. Neither the White House, nor Madame Secretary have bothered to take the time to condemn the latest rocket attacks from Gaza, or the spate of bulldozer attacks in Jerusalem. Here's your wake up call Hillary; you're supposed to at least give some lip service to condemning the attacks before you fuck Israel over behind closed doors. The rockets are okay with you. Message received.

For his part Senate Foreign Relations Botox Ogre John Kerry admits that appeasing Syria will give us nothing, but we should still pressure Israel to return the Golan Heights to Syria. Wow John, what a fucking great plan. That's right up there with Iran/Contra. Good thing you're part of our new foreign policy brain trust. We wouldn't want anyone thinking we had anything resembling competent leadership. High Five!

Caroline Glick sums up the problem rather succinctly:
Then, too, as both Kerry and Clinton made clear, the administration plans to ignore Syria's support for Iraqi, Palestinian and Lebanese terrorism, its nuclear proliferation activities and its massive ballistic missile arsenal, as well as its strategic alliance with Iran. Rather than confront Syria about its bad behavior, the administration favors a policy based on making believe that in his heart of hearts, Assad is a liberal democrat who aspires to peace, and hope, and change.
But the core of the administration's campaign to ignore Iran's nuclear program - as well as Syria's - is its unrelenting quest for the big payoff: Palestinian statehood.
This week Iran staged yet another "Destroy Israel" conference in Teheran, replete with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's trademark Holocaust denial, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's ritual castigation of the Jewish state as a "cancerous tumor," and the US as a treacherous enemy, and Ali Larijani's threat to attack Israel's suspected nuclear sites. The conference enjoyed a newfound sense of international legitimacy, taking place as it did just after burka-clad Annette Bening's goodwill Hollywood celebrity visit to the mullocracy.

THE GENOCIDAL pageantry in Teheran elicited no significant response from Clinton and Kerry. They had bigger fish to fry. While the administration and its supporters seem to believe that the US has no right to make demands on Iran and Syria, which, they assert, are both just advancing their national interests, for them Israel is a completely different story. As Clinton and Kerry demonstrated this week, the administration and its supporters will not stop making demands on Israel.

Kerry justified Syria's continued alliance with Iran by saying that Syria should be expected to "play both sides of the fence [with the US and Iran] as other nations do when they believe it is in their interests.

And here's the antidote for those of you still holding on to the notion that Secretary Clinton will stand by Israel, and work to maintain American security interests. Again from Glick:
Clinton joined Kerry in his efforts to compel the Jewish state to ignore its national interests in the cause of the higher goal of Palestinian statehood. Like him, she attacked Israel for not handing control over its borders with Gaza to Hamas. And like Kerry, she stated repeatedly that her greatest goal is to establish a Palestinian state.

Clinton's unique contribution to that great "pro-peace" endeavor this week was her outspoken criticism on Wednesday of the Jerusalem Municipality's decision to enforce the city's building and planning ordinances equally toward both Jews and Arabs. That policy was made clear this week when city inspectors destroyed illegal buildings in both Jewish and Arab neighborhoods.

Since as far as Clinton is concerned, Israel will one day be required to throw all the Jews out of East, South and North Jerusalem to make room for what she believes is the "inevitable" Palestinian state, Israel has no right to treat Arabs and Jews equally in its soon-to-be-inevitably divided capital city. Arabs should be allowed to break the law at will. When Israel insists on enforcing its laws without prejudice, Clinton condemns it for being anti-peace.
Appeasing and strengthening radical jihadists is not in the interests of the United States, or Europe for that matter. But since Pampers seems to have a rabid dislike for the British (they aren't Socialist enough for his taste I suppose), that comes as no surprise.

Here's a wake up call you Pampers Administration dingdongs. Israel is a sovereign nation that is not going to kowtow to the U.S. in order to compromise its security, at least not with a Netanyahu government. Oh how you must wish Ehud Barak had won. What amazing Barack Barak bumperstickers you could have sold to all the dimwitted Jews who voted for Shirley Peron. Perhaps some Israeli arms deals and security arrangements with India and China will change your tune. You dinks really think that turning out Israel will make the Jihadists love you don't you? My god you're dumber than a bag of hammers.

If you haven't figured it out by now the Resident doesn't care if Iran gets the Bomb, and his retarded policy vis a vis Israel is not going to generate regional stability if the payoff is a terror kleptocracy in a Palestinian state, with a nuclear Iran still allied with Syria. No wonder the grunts of the USMC don't really like this putz. It must be a little difficult to take orders from a man that is busy colluding with our enemies.



So here's the nutshell on Pampers' Middle East policy: Let Iran have nukes. Screw Israel. Peace will break out anyway. I have been saying since early last year that this was the case. What I didn't expect was that Clinton would so readily buy into this. I really thought she'd change the tune over at State, but have to admit that in the back of my mind that this would happen. Sorry folks, she's just a Pampers toady now. What a waste. Of course, all you leftist Jew haters must be thrilled.

Newsflash Resident Asshole, you are not buying the world a fucking Coke and keeping it company.

To throw you a bone Hillary, I do support the creation of a Palestinian state. Israel, after removing the terror kleptocracy that is the Palestinian Authority, should annex the West Bank and exclude Gaza. Barry, Hill, and Lurch can invest in building hotel/casinos in Gaza and have their own suites so they can play Obama's Eleven.

I wonder if Hillary is still planning to do anything about the slave trade and helping children internationally, or is she going to throw that stuff over in favor of helping to traffic blood diamonds? Only time will tell.

Of course, this presents a golden opportunity for Israel to tell the United States to go blow. China and India have a lot of capital to invest in technology development. The Chinese are apparently interested in cutting their oil imports (they used to be an exporter). A Chinese firm is partnering with Israel on electric plug-in technology. The Russians might be interested in having Israeli port access. And there had been talk at one point about transporting Russian oil through Israel rather than the Suez canal. Arrangements like that could be very beneficial to a nation that is tired of having its hands tied by a country that pays it lip service in support while selling her out to OPEC countries.

I wonder how Pampers and Co. will feel if Bibi makes a trip to Russia. Not too good I suspect.

This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass Barry.




12 comments:

navyvet48 said...

I suspected this would happen with Clinton. It was confirmed for sure when she went to China with a total different tone. Hillary never did really speak out against the sexism and shit in the primaries. That is when she lost me. Call it ESP but I knew her suspension speech was contrived it was just the introduction of her concession speech. She is a total disappointment. Exactly why I said in my bio that my eyes are wide open now. No one in DC represents "we the people".

garychapelhill said...

HA! I love the portable teleprompter..., It looks like something straight out of "Brazil".

Shtuey said...

I love that movie...very apt for the current twisted Orwellian nightmare we're living.

lililam said...

Shtuey, I don't think I have ever been in disagreement with you thus far, but I have noticed that most of the anti-Israel/Hillary citations I have seen lately lack diect quotes from Hillary. Maybe I'm in denial, but I would like to see direct quotes and when I'm less tired I will attempt to find some. I did see a quote from her the other day where she actually did say that the Israelis have every right to defend themselves if they continue to be shelled as they are. i believe I saw this on Dipnote, but i will check. I am tired of being disappointed, shtuey, but understand that I may be.

Shtuey said...

I agree lililam about the lack of direct quotes. But I've read Glick for years now, and her analysis is usually on. There is a definite shift that she does not seem to resisting. Her lack of public condemnation for acts of terror speaks volumes. This does not seem like the Hillary that swore to act against Iran if Israel was attacked in the Pennsy debate last year.

American Genie said...

Wow, Shtuey! Been reading your comments at the Monster for some time, but this is my first visit here.

You are now bookmarked, & "I will be back."

Great stuff!

God bless America!

Shtuey said...

Welcome, AG! I too have seen you at the Monster. I grabbed the video of the Marines via your blog and owe you a hat tip.

Anonymous said...

HRC seems to have very strong words for Iran's meddling in the middle east and stirring up hatred towards Israel. I agree with her and think she is on top of things. A lot of focus is being put on Iran - rightly so.

- FT

Anonymous said...

Actually, your poll might have come out differently had someone not gone to a bunch of different computers to vote, thereby skewing the results. Just thought you should know.

Shtuey said...

I hope no one was committing voter fraud to scew the results of a highly scientific OMV poll. That would be very Pampers-like.

FT; as we know, words and actions are two different things. I'm watching to see where all of this goes. Where it's headed right now is the empowering of Iran's Hamas proxy in Gaza, and appeasing Iran's ally Syria. That's not exactly being tough on Iran as much as it's helping them.

It's going to be difficult for HRC supporters to see this happen, but it already is.

Anonymous said...

According to the New York Times HRC reflects on her middle eastern meetings with national leaders:

"Clinton said she was struck by the depth of fear about Iran and the extent to which officials say it meddles in their affairs.

'There is a great deal of concern about Iran from this whole region,' she said to reporters on Wednesday. “It is clear Iran intends to interfere with the internal affairs of all of these people and try to continue their efforts to fund terrorism, whether it is Hezbollah or Hamas or other proxies.' "

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/05/washington/05diplo.html?scp=7&sq=Dmitry%20A.%20Medvedev%20letter&st=cse

So Shtuey - you prefer some PNAC babble about known unknowns? I have much more confidence in HRC than any opportunistic neo-cons and their supporters who did such a f*cking horrible job in Iraq.

-FT

Shtuey said...

FT, Secretary Clinton works for barry now. Pressuring Israel to open its border with Gaza, making no reference to Hamas having to release Gilad Shalit before this happens...these are not good signs. I don't dispute that she understands the region's concerns regarding Iran. What is she going to do about it is the question. She works for Barry now.

There is also no disputing that Barry's policy toward Syria is appeasement. I see no indication from HRC that she has any objection to this. Kerry made it clear that U.S. policy is going to be pressuring Israel to give back the Golan Heights. Israel was only able to stop Syria, which currently supplies Hizbullah with Iranian weapons, from shelling Israeli towns when it took this territory in 1967. Giving back the Golan is suicide for Israel, and Kerry already acknowledged that this probably wouldn't get Syria to leave Iran's side. Again, no objection from Clinton on this. Not a neocon conspiracy theory, a fact.

She is also on board with Barry pledging 900 million bucks to Gaza and the Palestinian Authority which serves to prop up a terror kleptocracy that still does not recognize Israel's right to exist. She has made statements that this money will not be given until they meet certain criterion; like renouncing violence, recognizing Israel, etc. Why make the pledge then before the conditions are met?

Hamas stated before HRC arrived in the region that they would not meet those obligations, and the Palestinian Authority has not met those conditions either, but she pledged the money in Egypt anyway. So again, she may understand the fear about Iran, but she is enabling a government that is hostile to Israel. She says Hamas must renounce violence and recognize Israel. The Palestinian Authority has not done this, and yet she considers them worthy of negotiating with.

This isn't about subscribing to a neocon agenda. This is about what is going on on the ground.

I am not going to wear rose colored glasses because the Secretary of State is Hillary Clinton. She's not the President. She's not making this policy. The question is will she continue to enable it, or denounce it?

We will see what happens once the Netanyahu government is in place. Right now, it's not lookin' too good.

If the money hadn't been pledged, if Clinton was pressuring the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel and dismantle the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, if we weren't sending envoys to Syria attempting to sway Assad with promises to pressure Israel to return the Golan, then I would be happier.

She has made statements pressuring Hamas to renounce violence. That's a no brainer. She should be pressuring them to release Gilad Shalit. That would mean something. Congresswoman Shelley Berkley of Nevada sent a petition to Hillary that would tie aid to Gaza to Shalit's release. No word from Clinton on this. Again, not a good sign. Not a neocon conspiracy. Berkley is a Democrat.

Clinton will have more opportunities to demonstrate her position. Eventually she will have to make the choice as to whether she is going to enable Barry or stand up to him. Right now the signs are pointing to enabling. I hope I'm wrong. As I said when she first took this job, it may come down to her deciding whether to stay or resign.