In Clinton and Marack's bizarro world of Jew hate how does the department of state and white house respond to Arab aggression against Jews? It doesn't. Take for instance the fact that on Saturday night, Arab terrorists lobbed a molotov cocktail at a car on route 443. In the car was a father and his nine month old son. Both were wounded. Did Clinton call Mahmoud Abbas to say that this undermined trust? No. Did she call Mahmoud Abbas to say that this showed a lack of Arab commitment to the "peace process?" No.
What's even more sick and twisted is that the Arab attacks on Jews on this highway are on the rise following the Israeli court ruling that it had to be opened to Falacstinian Authority Arab traffic. This should be seen as yet a further commitment to peace by Israel, but it apparently does not rate. The IDF had closed 443 to them during the Oslo War. Now that they are getting access again Jewish drivers are being attacked on a regular basis. I didn't hear anything coming out of Joe Biden's stupid fat mouth about that, or Clinton's or Marack's. The message to the Arabs from the United States is loud and clear: Try and kill the Jews, we simply don't care.
According to Arutz-7 there were 299 firebomb attacks and 22,450 incidents of Arab rock throwing at Jews.
Jews cannot build homes, but Arabs can kill Jews. I guess we're about to find out just how much the American Congress loves Israel. So far only two congressional officials, Nevada Democrat Shelly Berkley, and minority leader John Boehner, have spoken up against the White House's lashing of Israel. Berkley characterized the White House response as an "irresponsible overreaction." Boehner said:
"the tone and substance we are seeing emerge as a pattern for this administration [regarding Israel] are both disappointing and of great concern."
Will there be anymore protest from Congress? It would be nice, but I'm not counting on it. The United States government is no friend of Israel, and it's about time that Israeli and American Jews woke up and realized that. Arab oil is worth more than our blood, and Jews have no entitlement to the protection of their human rights. Don't believe me? When a car bomb exploded in Northern Ireland secretary Clinton condemned it as destabilizing to the peace process. The repeated murders and attempted murders of Jews by Arabs, including the FA president's own men, apparently are not seen that way by madame secretary. The only bright spot on the Jewish human rights front is that Congress rejected the Goldstone Report that seeks to strip Israel of its right of self-defence. This does not mean that Marack will order a veto of a Goldstone resolution in the UN. Since when does he care what Congress thinks?
Since the premise of the freeze was to bring the Arabs to the table, and presumably get the United States to take its thumb out of its ass on Iran's nuclear program, and neither of those things transpired, you would think the freeze would be cancelled. But since it's really about curbing the power of religious Jews, and not about the Arabs or Iran, don't count on that happening. Instead, expect more bowing and scraping from Bibi, and more condemnation from Marack, Clinton, and the rest of the idiots at Jew Hate Central on Pennsylvania Avenue.
Posts
10 comments:
I just don't get it. Just 3 months ago, Hillary was praising Israel for freezing WB settlement construction except for E. Jerusalem and now all of a sudden it's an insult? WTF? Also, are the 1600 units even in E. Jerusalem or are they planned for N. Jerusalem?
Come on, Ron. This administration has been about dismantling Israel from the beginning, and Clinton willingly does what she's told. Ramat Shlomo is in northern Jerusalem on land annexed after the liberation from the Jordanian occupation in 1967. It is not disputed. Even if it was eastern Jerusalem it doesn't matter. There is no "east" Jerusalem. The city was divided when Jordan illegally occupied it and the Jews were expelled. It was the only period when no Jews lived in that part of the city. All of Jerusalem is under Israeli sovereignty, north, south, east and west, and it will remain so. Bottom line is that the US accepted the fact that construction in Jerusalem was going to continue. They didn't like it, but it's not their job to like it.
This is racism, pure and simple. Hillary is a willing functionary and a disgrace. Kindness was simply a carrot. Now Israel is getting whacked with the stick for not rolling over. Arabs can build wherever they want. Arabs can attack and kill Jews. There is no condemnation from the White House or Foggy Bottom, and there hasn't been since January 2009.
Of course, even when there was condemnation under Shrub, the US was still arming and training Fatah terrorists...and America is still doing it.
Yes, I know what Marack would like to do to Israel but I'm addressing what Hillary said in public Oct 31/Nov 1 last year. There's a direct contradiction. Also, how come even the JPost doesn't even know where Ramat Shlomo is? I looked it up with Google Earth and saw it was North, not East.
This is just a fabricated incident, and excuse to threaten Israel and keep her from taking action against Iran. Makes me sick.
It's not really a contradiction when you think about it. She praised the freeze because they wanted it, but they want Jerusalem too. Now that they are finding out that Israel meant it when Bibi said building in Jerusalem would continue they are pitching a hissy.
You are absolutely right that this is engineered. The truth is that Bibi may even be involved. He could use this increased pressure as an excuse to something like the following: instead of caving on Jerusalem he would say, dismantle a Jewish community somewhere in central Judea.
I'm not sure how this is supposed to stay Israel's hand on Iran exactly, though I've read that this may be what this hubbub is about. The freeze was seen to be something that would extract a green light from Marack. Now it's clear Israel isn't going to get it without Jerusalem. Israel has been prepared to go it alone, and will. The White House played this very poorly. They made demands and offered nothing in return. Now they are beating on Israel over nothing. Israel has known for a while that America is not going to do anything about Iranian nukes so all this really does is increase the tensions with the Arabs, which is what I think is Marack's real intent. If he can get a war going he can use the UN to impose an Arab state on the '67 borders and the final solution can begin.
Everything he has done has increased tension between the Arabs and Jews. Considering his loathing of Israel I don't see any other reason for what he's doing than to help spark the war.
Sending some readers your way who are offended over this latest outrage (including me).
thank you Shtuey! What a great post. it's sickening how the only country Obama stands up against is Israel. And I am terribly disappointed in Hillary.
Thank you new readers. Make up a name for yourselves so we can at least call you something besides anonymous.
As I've been saying since 2008, Marack is a Jew hater who came of age in an anti Jew cabal with Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said, and Bill Ayers among others. We all got to hear the Jew hating invective of Jeremiah Wright. No one should be surprised that Marack is such a vociferous hater of Israel. It's been out front all this time.
And Clinton has been on the Israel beat down bandwagon from "day one" as Secretary of State. Like any other politician, she kissed Jewish ass as Senator from New York. Now she's Secretary of State and it's time to take a dump on Israel. Disappointing? Yes. A surprise? Not really. After all, this is the woman that hugged and kissed Sura Arafat, the now widow of the father of modern terrorism, and avowed hater of the Jewish people, Yasser Arafat, may he burn in torment forever.
What a real leader of Israel would do at this point is make a pointed phone call to the Secretary of State to inform her that her credentials to visit Israel are revoked. The next call would be to the White House to tell the ass who would be king that no envoys or diplomats from the United States will be received until the United States accepts that Jewish construction in Jerusalem will not be curbed, that the city will not be divided, that any threats to her sovereignty will be met with force, and that the freeze is over and will not be reengaged. There are a number of powerful American corporations that have a vested interest in maintaining relations with Israel. She need only maintain relationships with them and the American people, not their government, which has undermined her sovereignty for decades.
Contrary to popular belief, Israel does not need American money, or weapons. It has become codependent, but does not need them. Israel has other friends in the region, like India, who are far more closely aligned in purpose and agenda than the United States, which is always willing to sell out the Jews for oil.
The other shoe to drop will be whether Bibi caves and calls for a halt on Jewish construction, or if he sticks to his guns.
Nothing has angered me more lately than this latest tiff over nothing. Now, the US wants concessions from Israel? Nuts to that!
A blessing in disguise - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3862515,00.html
Well, this sucks but at least there's no mention of Ramat Shlomo:
http://www.debka.com/article/8650/
Of course, it's all about Iran:
http://www.debka.com/article/8651/
Funny thing is, Abbas says it's Iran that stands in the way, not Israel:
http://daledamos.blogspot.com/2010/03/abbas-fingers-country-most-responsible.html
I think Hillary is so wrong in this area...
It seemed to me that that the "Falacstinians" were ready to come to the table for talks as a result of the Israeli insistence on their own autonomy and refusal to stop expansion; UNTIL the US interfered ...
Post a Comment