It's the same in any lingo

בַּת-בָּבֶל, הַשְּׁדוּדָה: אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיְשַׁלֶּם-לָךְ-- אֶת-גְּמוּלֵךְ, שֶׁגָּמַלְתּ לָנוּ
אַשְׁרֵי שֶׁיֹּאחֵז וְנִפֵּץ אֶת-עֹלָלַיִךְ-- אֶל-הַסָּלַע


How can one be compelled to accept slavery? I simply refuse to do the master's bidding. He may torture me, break my bones to atoms and even kill me. He will then have my dead body, not my obedience. Ultimately, therefore, it is I who am the victor and not he, for he has failed in getting me to do what he wanted done. ~ Mahatma Gandhi
If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am not for others, what am I? If not now, when? ~ Rav Hillel, Pirke Avot

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes

This Red Sea Pedestrian Stands against Judeophobes
Wear It With Pride

26 November 2009

Another OMV First: The Golden Turkey Award

Yom Ha Turkey seems like an auspicious time to unveil a new douchalicious award.

The first ever Golden Turkey Indik Eisl Prize goes to Secretary of State HILLARY CLINTON!!!!

Hillary has earned the prize by revealing what this blogger has been saying since last year, that Marack Pajama intends to force Israel to accept the 1967 "green line" as her final status borders (this of course would mean a divided Jerusalem, as well as being cut off from the tombs of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, and Leah, as well as Aaron's sons.

Here's the proof, right from the horse's mouth:
"We believe that through good-faith negotiations the parties can mutually agree on an outcome which ends the conflict and reconciles the Palestinian goal of an independent and viable state based on the 1967 lines, with agreed swaps, and the Israeli goal of a Jewish state with secure and recognized borders that reflect subsequent developments and meet Israeli security requirements."

As I, and innumerable Jewish bloggers have written over the last several months, there is no possible way for Israel to secure her borders at those lines. That's why we're not giving up the high ground you dummy. Swapping land? Yes, that inane idea has been floated before. It has been, and always shall be just plain stupid.

This land does not belong to the Arabs. It belongs to us. Wherever you put a shovel in the earth you uncover more evidence that ties us there as the aboriginal people of this land for 4000 years. The Falacstinians? Not so much. Forget the Torah. Archeological evidence is indisputable, even to non-believers. The Arabs have tried to pass themselves off as the Philistines, the Hittites, Jebusites...I think they should try saying they are the Visigoths next...just for shits and giggles.

So, good luck trying to get us back to the Auschwitz lines of '67. The Falacstinian state idea crashed an burned when the Arabs chose 100 years of Jewish genocide instead of coexistence. B"H we'll have Jews instead of kapos running the country soon, and the Arabs will finally have to accept the 22 countries they already have. They don't get another.

Take your Golden Turkey and cram it, Hillary. And then cram it up George Carp Face Mitchell when you're done.

5 comments:

Alessandro Machi said...

What Does Agreed Swaps mean? It sounds like it means 1967 boundaries, but with swaps to make the borders more logical.

I don't know the topography of the land but keeping higher ground does make sense. I don't recall hearing that reason given before but I presume it has.

Sorry to see you hating on Hillary Clinton so much.

Shtuey said...

The land swaps thing means Israel keeping some of the land east of the 1967 ceasefire lines, while trading equivalent land areas from west of the line with large Arab population centers. The problem with that is that these areas compromise places vital to Israel maintaining the security provided by the hills of the Shomron and Judea. Not having this topographical advantage was why Israel struck first in 1967. Had they waited for the Arab offensive to begin Israel would most likely not exist. At its thinest point there was eight miles separating Jordanian controlled territory and the Mediterranean. This would have bisected Israel in half and the breaking of her defenses would have been accomplished rather easily. To go back to this situation now is untenable for Israel.

As for "hating" on Hillary goes; she talked a very pro-Israel game during the campaign, but has reversed those positions as Secretary of State. Just as I have roundlt criticized the man in the White House for doing things like telling AIPAC Jerusalem would never be divided one day, and tell Arabs the opposite the next, I will do the same with Hillary. It would be hypocritical of me to turn a blind eye to her own hypocrisy simply because she's Hillary.

Though she serves at the pleasure of the President, she chooses to play this part. Either she believes in his policies, or is being a mouthpiece for something she knows is wrong. I consider the latter to be a far greater crime of conscience. Only she knows what it is she believes. Regardless of what that is, she is speaking on behalf of a policy that rewards a genocidal body politic, which continues to make clear its intentions to enact the destruction of the Jewish state.

As Dr. King said, "In the end we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."

There is plenty of reason for world Jewry, particularly the Jews of New York State, to question whether Hillary Clinton, the woman who embraced and kissed Sura Arafat, but refused to meet with Israel's Military Chief this past winter, was a friend of ours or not.

American Genie said...

Damn, Shtuey. I've missed you. Good to be back on blogger.

Your godlike brain did an excellent job on the post and the education of the first commenter.

Shtuey said...

Hey Genie! Nice to have you back!

Anonymous said...

Hilary, of course has proved herself to be what anyone paying attention knows. Comedian Jackie Mason said it best: Hilary changes her position more than a hooker in a whorehouse...fitting description, I would think.